Pages

Feed icon
Support us on facebook!

Saturday 17 July 2010

Ignorant Scholars


Only yesterday I have decided to give up listening to Mid-eastern scholars for good (with all due respect to the very few exceptions,) for it has gone too far just yet. I couldn't help but notice the highly sexist fatwa. People who know me know that I adore the word sexist, because I'm so used to it, because it's everywhere! As long as there will be many 'scholars' who are men, there forever will be fatwas that allow them and their fellow men to enjoy all sorts of pleasures with females, like forced sex with your wive, or a man being able to beat her up freely if she refuses the sex (rape, ain't it?) or her not allowed to see God's great sun by not allowing her to leave the house, or having the 'right' to keep her from seeing relatives in the name of 'God gave me control over you'. If I practice MY ISLAM the way those scholars want me do, I'd just turn myself into a slave and go to my wedding with a chain and a metal ball tied to my foot, how about that?

All I hear is 'A man can, and a man can, and a man can!' Well, you know what? 'A man had to do this, and that, and that, and that, and he did nothing of those'.
There's nothing surprising with sexist fatwa in an equal religion. Doubtlessly, many 'scholars' are lustful and greedy and have the POWER, the AUTHORITY, and the LEGAL ABILITY to do what they like and change the standards of this society like long ago when the Jilbab fashion broke out, or when people were first introduced to Televisions and 'scholars' called them T.V's 'The Greater Devil' until only the creative scholars were able to spread a message through it by broadcasting Quran and religion shows. Thank you, dear 'scholars', you have successfully ruined the name of MY ISLAM. Arabs to this day use marriage as a tool to get rid of their children.

If you give up your 2-year-old to some man, how can you be sure he's not going to sexually molest her? If your father gave your 2-year-old sister to some man, why did you shut up and not say anything? Who's responsible for this is you and me.

Truth it is that too many fatwas tried to pull people back to the stone age. Even if Al Sayeda Aisha was married at the age of five (or six or seven) which I DOUBT with all my heart, even if it was true (in an era where women were both mentally and physically mature at the age of five and six and when marrying young women was widely spread!) would she be like a 21-century girl of age of five? And isn't that completely against the Quran where it says 'Marry WOMEN' and not CHILDREN.

Yes, I have my doubts about many Ahadith (Hadiths) narrated by Al Sayeda Aisha (may God bless her), and I even doubt they have been somehow either altered or else. Some of them are opposite to Quran, out of context, highly sexist, or abusive to women. The worst of them show Prophet Muhammed (peace and prayer be upon him) as the man he is not! Who truly validated those Ahadiths (Hadiths)? How is it possible for us to validate them? Isn't validation better than trying to explain them to suit the Arab mind? Even the early scholars explained Islam in a somewhat restarted and highly sexist way. Why? Well, with all respect to the wonderful gentlemen who sought this life in thought and wisdom, scholars were mostly men, too. A woman is not even allowed grab the microphone in the mosque and say what she has to say even if it's true and worth being spoken out. Why? I don't see anywhere in Quran when it says Women can't give speeches like men. How about the queen of Sheba? THE QUEEN OF SHEBA, people! A woman in POLITICS! Oh, don't seclude women from societies, dear 'scholars', because you can't handle them! So yes, most 'scholars' were men, and thus, sadly, even one man (high authority and wealth will help) can be sexist and drag the whole population down with him!

Only because you some of you parents failed to raise your children on the human Fitra (natural feeling) and good manners, it doesn't give you the right to make them marry young to protect them from Zinna (adultery). 

(Note: I have used the word scholars between two apostrophes to indicate the false ones. No names will be mentioned. (We're still Muslims and we like to keep scandals under a thick blanket.))
Signed

4 spoke up:

Haitham Seelawi said...

Not really out of context:

والائي يئسن من المحيض من نسائكم ان ارتبتم فعدتهنَّ ثلثة أشهر والائي لم يحضن واولات الأحمال اجلهنَّ أن يضعن حملهن ومن يتق الله يجعل له من أمره يسر

والائي لم يحضن means a girl that did not mature yet, so yes, in Quarn a man can marry a girl that did not mature yet! I am not against what you say but I am trying to correct that little mistake!

The Arab Laundry said...

First of all, if Allah wanted to allow marriages to immature women, he would have told it clearly.

"والائي لم يحضن means a girl that did not mature yet."

Umm, not really. If Allah meant girls who are not mature, as you said YET, He (swt) would have said والائي لم يحضن بعد and just to clarify, it actually means women who are pregnant and are not sure yet. Missing period is the first sign of pregnancy, and yet you cannot quite tell whether you are pregnant or not. (You're a guy, I'll try to go slower.)

Periods are a messy world of getting off track or on track. They aren't as frequent as our mothers like to make us think they are. Depression, wieght loss, pregnancy, or stress can alter the period dates.

Besides, where's logic in your explaination? How can a 2-year-old do the duty of a mature wive? And I don't mean just the sex part. I'm talking about keeping the house clean and taking care of children (if her husband had any before) or cooking, or for that, laundry or sewing, or talking to neighbours? Islam is a logic religion, and that verse explaing incorrectly would be the opposite of this verse:

[(4:3) - Al Nisa] If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, Two or three or four.

If Allah (swt) wanted to allow Child Marriage, He (swt) would have said it CLEARLY, and DIRECTLY.

cut the crap! said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
The Arab Laundry said...

@cut the crap!

I believe you didn't get the 'your french will not be excused' part. Oh, please leave a link next time. Come again!

Post a Comment

We're all for freedom of expression; however, YOUR FRENCH WILL NOT BE EXCUSED. Neither will be any blasphemy.